Install Theme

star trek vs doctor who, part 1

Here I present part 1 of what I hope to be a continuing series of discussions comparing and contrasting Star Trek and Doctor Who episodes that aired in the same week. My focus is sound-driven, so there are clips to watch and listen to for illustration and reinforcement. This is kind of like a window into the research I do. Enjoy!


This week I’m giving a talk on my dissertation project, which is an historical study of television production in the UK using Doctor Who as a test subject. An idea that popped into my head to try and highlight the differences (and similarities) between American and British television at the time was to find an episode of Star Trek that aired the same week as an episode of Doctor Who, and play clips to show the difference. It seems like it would be a good jumping-off point into further discussion of the differences in television at the time. A logical starting point is the first aired episode of Star Trek, “The Man Trap,” which transmitted on Thursday, September 8, 1966 on NBC. Two days later the BBC transmitted part 1 of “The Smugglers,” which is unfortunately on the list of wiped episodes. While we have the remaining audio, the video is gone, and if I’m giving a visual presentation I should stick with something that the students can watch. The next overlap of existing episodes is “What Are Little Girls Made Of?” [ST], aired Thursday, October 6th, 1966 on NBC, and the first part of “The Tenth Planet” [DW] aired on Saturday, October 8th, 1966. So that’s where I’ll begin.

A few things to consider first:
1. Star Trek is an episodic program, and each aired episode is designed to be a self-contained story. Doctor Who, on the other hand, is an ‘episodic serial’, meaning that there were individual stories in each season that within themselves contained anywhere from 2-10 episodes. This is important to keep in mind because it creates a totally different narrative structure for the two shows.
2. Being an American production, Star Trek was therefore produced for ad-supported television. This means that each episode has built in breaks for commercials, usually with musical cues that lead into and out of each break (‘stingers’). Doctor Who, being produced by the royally funded BBC, does not contain pre-planned commercial breaks and lacks commercial stingers. It does, however, have what I like to call ‘transition cues’, meaning that transitions from scene to scene are accompanied by a short musical idea to aid in the transition.
3. Star Trek was recorded all in color, while Doctor Who was transmitted in black and white until 1970. This creates an obvious difference in visual quality and coloration. The association of color and sound versus black & white and sound is an interesting one to me.

"What are Little Girls Made Of?"

The first thing I notice while watching is the cold open, a typical occurrence in Star Trek. It’s a clever production method as well; establish the story, hook in the viewer, build up the drama, then create tension by cutting away into the melodramatic opening theme. I really admire the use and reuse of material from the main theme; that horn call is borrowed from the main theme, and is used quite frequently with imagery of the USS Enterprise. Nearly all establishing cuts are of the Enterprise circling a planet, and have that same cue accompanying the imagery. The tune is frequently adjusted to match the mood of the following segment: when in peril, it’s often in minor mode, or using low brass, sometimes the speed is increased or decreased for happy/excited or sad/melancholy sequences. This is a quite marked difference from the cues of Doctor Who, which I’ll get to below.

[Watch the whole episode here!]

There is A LOT of music in this story. Nearly every scene has underscoring of some kind, even dialogue. (There are also lots of pointy boobs, but that’s neither here nor there.) The music is very obviously synched with the dialogue and action on screen, and based on the on-set noise we hear (chairs moving, shuffling, footsteps, etc.) there were mics set in stage to pick up dialogue. This is actually quite apparent after Nurse Chapel has dinner with the android Kirk; when Korby comes into the room to discuss the merits of the android to Kirk and Chapel you can hear his voice get softer as he turns his head towards Kirk. The mic must have been hanging above the dinner table.

There’s also quite obvious thematic use of musical material in Star Trek. Aside from the reuse of the “Enterprise motif” there is a prominent use of a romantic/femme fatale cue used for Andrea, Korby’s android companion. Each time she has any kind of action on screen, or is talked to by any other character, a string-heavy, melodramatic, stereotypical Classic Hollywood vixen cue plays. It makes sense that they give her a specific musical cue, as she becomes so important to the conclusion of the episode. The use of a full orchestra was standard for NBC programmes in the 60s; they frequently tapped into the NBC Radio Orchestra to record tracks for tv shows. In the case of Star Trek, these cues were often created in the first season for a specific episode and were then reused in seasons two and three, sometimes to the cue’s detriment (a discussion I’m saving for a later post). The use of the full orchestra gives a cinematic sound to these stories, mostly because of our familiarity with those sounds from Classic Hollywood epics of the 40s and 50s. Which, at the time of this airing, was not that long before. We’re used to that large, acoustic sound now on television. But in the 60s, it had a very clear connection to cinematic quality. Shows like Star Trek made television hours into mini-movies. Before then the dominant programme types were variety, sitcom, anthology, and live performance shows that rarely lasted more than 30 minutes. This is a clear departure from those. And possibly part of why Star Trek took so long to catch on with a general audience.

"The Tenth Planet", Part 1

Just two days later in the UK, the BBC transmitted part 1 of “The Tenth Planet,” the story that would be William Hartnell’s last as the Doctor (or Doctor Who, or Dr Who). I can probably count the minutes of music in the first episode on one hand. There is no cold open here; we start right off the bat with the show’s signature tune. Which, if you play it back to back with the Star Trek theme, sounds like it’s from a totally different universe. Maybe it is? The purely electronic sound created by Delia Derbyshire at the BBC Radiophonic Workshop is really unlike anything else on television at the time. It really drives home that the aesthetic of Doctor Who is quite different than that of Star Trek. Those slick, colorful sets and super stylish outfits aboard the Enterprise have no place on the TARDIS.

[tube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oO9zMmZyYV0[/tube]

I can count the airtime minutes of music in this episode on one hand. There is no thematic usage of music here; instead, the little incidental music used in the episode is generally atmospheric. The establishing shots of the frozen tundra are accompanied by a small chamber orchestra playing a repetitive ostinato that is clearly meant to highlight the vast, unending frozen landscape around them. We get a glimpse into the life of the men at the South Pole base when one man is shown singing “La donna è mobile" from Verdi’s Rigoletto, which is a rare moment of diegetic performance in the show’s history (much of which happens during the First Doctor’s time, something I’ll be writing about at some point). At minute 00:41 of part 2 (below) we get a subtle, amelodic, woodwind-led cue as the astronauts see a mysterious planet, and a more frantic cue at 01:50 when they realize they’re having fuel troubles. At 02:28 we get another synched cue when the men at the station see the mysterious planet. The cues, based on their synchronization, are meant to represent that planet, or the anxiety/fear/curiosity in the men created by the sight of that planet. It comes back at 3:59 when the ships starts to spin out of control. Yet here, unlike in Star Trek, the cue is not thematic; it is no longer emblematic of a specific character, mood, or idea. It merely embodies panic, and loss of control. It’s meant to reinforce the doubt created by the unknown. It does more for coloration, so to speak, of the visuals than providing information or representing anything.

[tube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N14FO6GMDg8[/tube]

The lack of music anywhere else can be explained by a few factors. One that comes to mind for me is making space for all the special sound used in this episode. Doctor Who's production team was always very keen on setting a location with atmospheric sounds; electronic whirrs, buzzes, pulses, beeps, and hums, that reinforced the cold metal and computers of space ships and military stations. The best way for these sounds to be heard and understood is to give them aural space, which meant keeping music out of the way. Another reason may be the sheer amount of cast members in the story. There are so many people contributing to dialogue and action that music would diverge attention from the action rather than helping along the story or communicating information to the viewers. Another is that this story uses stock music, and has no specially-composed music for the episodes. Stock music provides an interesting challenge to editors. Unlike specially composed, new music, made just for the programme, stock music is usually concert/orchestral music stored in a sound library. Anyone can use it. Also, since these tracks were not necessarily designed for television, they may not have natural ins-and-outs that one can edit into with noticeably cutting into a musical line. The production team on Doctor Who carefully selected a short fragment for their liking and used its sparingly. The times when it plays longer are over longer sequences that require less cutting.

It’s interesting to see how differences in production attitudes for these two benchmark SF programmes. I can’t get over how modern Doctor Who feels and how Classic Hollywood Star Trek feels. And amazingly, even for being in color, Star Trek feels much more ‘dated’ than Doctor Who. Aside from being in black and white, “The Tenth Planet” has more of a timeless quality than “What Are Little Girls Made Of?” which feels 100% a product of the swinging 60s. (Which was something credited to London, of all places.) Another point for another article in the future.

You can watch the full episode of “What Are Little Girls Made Of?” for free with an Amazon Prime account here:

and a savvy YouTube search can provide the extant episodes of “The Tenth Planet.”.


That does it for part 1 of “Star Trek vs Doctor Who.” Stay tuned for another installment where I’ll dissect another pair of stories that aired the same week.

fun with polyvore :: spring teaching

This whole Polyvore thing is a bit new to me. Being a college instructor, I thought it would be useful to other university employees, staff, administrators, and assistants to get ideas of things to wear in the office or classroom that are professional and practical. Wearing things for the office, where you’re sitting, is one thing. Wearing appropriate outfits in the classroom is a totally different animal. Babydoll length dresses are adorable but don’t work well in a classroom. So that inspired me to start putting together outfits appropriate for the university classroom that still had style and function.

Here’s my first one!

Teaching in the Spring with Modcloth
Teaching in the Spring with Modcloth by emilyooo featuring vintage style heels

Top
$33 - modcloth.com

Blazer
$65 - modcloth.com

Pastel jeans
$78 - modcloth.com

Vintage style heels
$35 - modcloth.com

Satchel bag
$64 - topshop.com

Ring
$12 - modcloth.com

Metal jewelry
$15 - modcloth.com

ek

this week’s faves

Another week brings another new week of obsessions. Right now it’s a combination of vintage prints and innovative home décor. But to be honest, that’s kind of all the time for me!

I can’t get over how wonderful and inspirational I find this knitting clock:

And the description is so lovely:

365 is stitching the time as it passes by. It is knitting 24 hours a day and one year at the time, showing the physical representation of time as a creative and tangible force. After 365 days the clock has turned the passed year into a 2-m long scarf. Now the past can be carried out in the future and the upcoming year is hiding in a new spool of thread, still unknitted.

If this is ever manufactured and available for sale I am 100% getting one. So clever and beautiful!

Someone I follow on twitter sent a link to this article about an IKEA catalogue from 1965, and now I’m obsessed with the entire site.

The color combinations are really appealing to me, especially the red, yellow, and green kitchen, and the combination of solid color accent pillows on black furniture with ash wood legs and a beige shag carpet. That way anything in that living room will match, no matter what gets thrown in. I also can’t decide if I think those are model shots or it’s just the staging. They kind of look like dollhouse furniture!

The ModCloth blog recently shared these photos from a 1960s beautification book that I am so in love with.

It’s like face yoga, before American really knew what yoga was. So weird and awesome.

One of my favorite blogs out there is A Beautiful Mess, which recently posted this wonderful tutorial on DIY fabric patterns using Fabric Fun dye sticks.

You better believe some DIY Doctor Who pillows are in my near future!

Have a great weekend!
ek

saturday is caturday!

A new feature … Saturday is Caturday!

Last week I catsit for friends of mine, and these pictures sum up their personalities pretty well.

Here is Mango. She refuses to hang out with me, so about 99% of the time I just see her walking away.

And here is Nigel, who continually tests the edibility of all objects.

And to make sure all of my bases are covered, Mayor Charles and I had a nice cuddle session this week:

Ronnie declined to participate in any social interactions due to his perpetual grumpiness.

ek

ETA: Mayor Charles, my model, helping me test out a fancy DSLR camera at home. He’s quite fetching.

ETA2: Ronnie creeps by, then runs off without any contact whatsoever:

my window to the world of doctor who

When you let it known to the world that you’re a Doctor Who fan, you usually find yourself answering questions about how long you’ve been watching and what you remember watching first.

"Who’s your Doctor? Who’s your first Doctor?”

For many people—British, American, or beyond—the answer is usually Tom Baker. The Fourth Doctor is their Doctor, and they remember watching syndicated Fourth Doctor stories on PBS or BBC2 when they were kids. I do remember watching Doctor Who on PBS when I was a kid, but Tom Baker isn’t the first Doctor I think of. For me, it’s Pat Troughton. Which is curious, considering so many of his episodes are lost and very little else was broadcast abroad because by the time the BBC sent tapes overseas color was the standard and stations weren’t interested in paying to air black and white.

Luckily for me, I’m from Chicago, and WTTW aired TONS of Doctor Who. It’s presence on WTTW went relatively uninterrupted from 1975 to 1996. Which is really impressive, considering Doctor Who was shelved in 1989. But WTTW had a special tie with Doctor Who; it was the channel that premiered “The Five Doctors”, even before the BBC did in the UK. Why? From what I can tell, it had a lot to do with stereo sound transmission.

We’re used to stereo sound being the standard in broadcast television, but back in 1983 mono sound was the norm. As early as 1975, Telesonics was experimenting with multichannel sound transmission, which was the vehicle needed to send stereo sound (mono being one channel, stereo being two or more, therefore a multichannel band was needed to send the extra sound information). Telesonics approached WTTW to test out the multichannel transmission, which began in 1979. WTTW engineers would eventually help set the standards eventually approved by the FCC. WTTW began transmitting full-time in stereo in October 1983, and it aired “The Five Doctors” in November of 1983. The Chicago PBS channel, then, became the perfect place to transmit the anniversary special, as it was one place where it was guaranteed to hit a large viewership in stereo. Not all Chicagoland sets received in stereo at the time, but the program was allowed transmission in stereo to test the quality of recording by the BBC, as well as to drum up interest in Doctor Who and stereo sound in the US. The BBC wouldn’t begin experimentations with transmitting Doctor Who in stereo until 1988 when they broadcast “Remembrance of the Daleks” in stereo sound to parts of London.

[There have been multiple accounts about “The Five Doctors” being in stereo or mono originally. It was initially recorded in four-channel stereo but broadcast in the UK with mono sound. It was later remixed for Dolby 5.1 for later DVD releases.]

So that brings me back to Pat Troughton. Why do I remember him so well from my childhood? My guess is the transmission of “The Three Doctors,” “The Five Doctors,” and “The Two Doctors” on WTTW. Chicago was a hub of Doctor Who fandom in the US, which resulted in an extensive catalogue of when WTTW aired Doctor Who. I was born in 1984, meaning that the tv I would start remembering would be from 1989 and onwards. Therefore, the times I would have seen Pat Troughton on my tv would have been:

"The Three Doctors"
May 28, 1989
October 23, 1990
July 14, 1996

"The Five Doctors"
July 21, 1996

"The Two Doctors"
May 19&26, 1991

The chances of me seeing those stories, especially in the mid-90s, are really good. That was before my family started forking over for cable, so I was watching VHS tapes, playing video games, and watching old British television on PBS all the time. Why I zeroed in on Pat Troughton and not Jon Pertwee or Colin Baker. My guess is with all the Three Stooges I watched as a kid that his black bowl cut stuck with me because of Moe.

Either way, it’s cool to have a resource like this to see what aired in Chicago. I’m not sure any other PBS stations have an extensive list like this. Just another reason why Chicago is the greatest city on Earth.

ek